Materials
The American Sandblasting School: the 2000S Sandblasted Pipe Debate
The assessment put forward by Fred Hanna in 2008, arguing that the best sandblasted pipes of the era came from independent American makers; the workshops named and the technical distinction the debate rests on.
The American sandblasting school is a collective heading used to sum up the debate that ran through the 2000s over whether the level American independent pipe makers reached in sandblast surfaces amounted to a distinct school of its own. One of the texts that gave the debate visibility is Fred Hanna's 2008 piece in The Pipe Collector, the bulletin of the North American Society of Pipe Collectors.
The society's origins trace to a collector circle in Ohio; records show it was founded in 1993 as the Ohio Pipe Collectors and took its current name in 1997. The bulletin is a regular publication gathering member articles and maker interviews.
The Subject of the Debate
Sandblasting is a surface treatment that erodes the soft summer rings of briar and leaves the hard winter rings standing in relief; its details are covered in the art of sandblasting entry. The method's established reference point in pipe making is Alfred Dunhill's Shell finish, based on a patent he filed for in 1917 and received in 1918. Hanna's claim is that the standard shifted in the following generation, and that, looking across countries and brands, the deepest and most detailed surfaces now came from independent American makers. The technical distinction the piece rests on is that sandblasting stops being a fix reached for to cover a flaw in the wood and becomes a surface language in its own right, one that renders the grain pattern legible.
Makers Named
The Rest of This Entry Is in the App
The full ISPE opens with your IPC account.
Related Entries
Last updated:
Source: Pipedia, adapted under the CC BY-SA licence.